There are no longer stark divisions between the fine arts and the popular arts. Such distinctions are matters of individual discrimination and taste.
Individuals who are less likely to be bound by cultural limits are by nature more receptive to imaginative works of art that appeal to their intellectual and emotional dispositions. Their tastes in films, music, and literary works reflect their own interests, rather than those of a narrow range of common experience that was once much more prevalent than it is now.
This is not to say that an age demographic is in play, but, in point of fact, to state the opposite. Works of aesthetic virtue are more accessible to a more diverse audience than ever.
Fashions and styles that once dominated cultural conditions (and cultural conditioning) no longer have a lock on the collective consciousness.
This affords freedom of expression in ways as yet not fully realized.
Individuals who are less likely to be bound by cultural limits are by nature more receptive to imaginative works of art that appeal to their intellectual and emotional dispositions. Their tastes in films, music, and literary works reflect their own interests, rather than those of a narrow range of common experience that was once much more prevalent than it is now.
This is not to say that an age demographic is in play, but, in point of fact, to state the opposite. Works of aesthetic virtue are more accessible to a more diverse audience than ever.
Fashions and styles that once dominated cultural conditions (and cultural conditioning) no longer have a lock on the collective consciousness.
This affords freedom of expression in ways as yet not fully realized.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments opened Jan. 2016. All comments moderated, out of respect for the intelligence of the audience.